Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Alan Sloane dies at 84

LAS VEGAS, NEVADA
Alan Price Sloane
Born October 29, 1926 ~ Passed on January 20, 2011

Alan was born and raised in Oxford, Ohio. He served in the Merchant Marine at the age of 17 (with his parents approval) during the closing days of World War II. He returned to Oxford and completed his degree at Miami University graduating in 1948. He was drafted and served in the Army during the Korean War. His professional broadcasting career spanned an extraordinary 60 years beginning with his first job as a radio DJ in Cleveland hosting a late night format with romantic music. His talent took him from Cleveland radio to a position in Dallas with WFAA-TV Channel-8 as their first Weather Anchor, and co-host of a television cooking show, to WWL-TV in New Orleans where he hosted a noon talk show with a "live" in-house band led by trumpet virtuoso Al Hurt. His next move was to WAGA-TV in Atlanta where his humor and style was noticed by a Hollywood talent scout who selected him to host a bi-centennial celebration of Margaret Mitchell's Gone With The Wind. The event, staged at the Loews Grand Theater, the site of the film's original premier in 1939. Alan introduced and interviewed David O. Selznick, Olivia deHavilland and dozens of visiting celebrities including actors George Murphy and Douglas Fairbanks, Jr.
Shortly after the event, he was offered an "on-air" position with KCOP-TV 13 in Los Angeles. During his tenure with KCOP he was the West Coast host of "The Advocate" and also hosted a variety of entertaining syndicated television shows produced by Bill Burrud Productions including the American West (featured in 102 markets nationally) and This Exciting World. In addition he hosted the original Los Angeles "Dialing For Dollars" show for KCOP for over 7 years. The highly poplar program (#2 in the market, just behind #1 "As The World Turns") was formatted as a daily one hour talk show from Noon to 1:00 p.m. featuring lively celebrity interviews with authors, actors, artists - a format that suited Alan's rapier wit and style. His busy schedule during those years also included hosting the annual "Holiday Lane Parade" coverage each Christmas, entertaining at VA hospitals and hundreds of personal appearances.
In 1969 Alan moved to KABC-TV 7 in Los Angeles where he was the weekday Weather Anchor for the 5, 6, and 11:00p.m. news broadcasts and also worked special assignments for ABC Sports. He served as Pit Announcer for the Can-Am auto race series - often flying the "red-eye" from L.A. to the East Coast, returning late Sunday nights in time for his Monday weather broadcasts.
Alan covered Track & Field events for ABC at the 1968 Olympics in Mexico City and the ill-fated 1972 Olympic in Munich. While at KABC-TV , he received two Emmy Nominations (1 award), and while at KCOP he was nominated three times and received 2 Emmys. He also made numerous appearances on the popular "Love Boat" television show and appeared in national commercials for Ford Thunderbird and Kraft Cheez Whiz.
After a management shakeup at KABC, Alan created a Business Travel Weather show concept. He was able to convince American Airlines of the show's merit. He then offered the complete package to the then fledgling national "Financial News Network" (now MSNBC). He went on-air at the Network in 1982 as National Weather Anchor with his daily early morning and mid-afternoon Business and Agricultural Weather shows which also included interviews with business newsmakers. After six years with the network, Alan decided to retire - for the first time - and relocated to Las Vegas in 1988. He had often covered Las Vegas news stories for KABC, including the infamous MGM fire. So, he was well acquainted with the area. Within less than a year of retiring, he was approached by the local NBC Affiliate, KVBC-TV 3 to work part-time as the station's Weekend Weather Anchor. A year later, the station's primary weekday Weather Anchor abruptly left and Alan took over the position, working full time for the next 7 years! He also hosted a half-hour weekend program titled "Action Seniors". He retired, again, in 1997, but continued to be active - developing and hosting a weekly radio show titled "FYI The Radio Show" in Las Vegas.
Alan relocated to Carmel Valley in September, 2008 and subsequently hosted a weekly television show "Choices" at Noon on the NBC affiliate KSBW-TV 8. The show was sponsored by Monterey based Choice Home Health Care.
From his 20's into his 80's, Alan continued to be an intuitive interviewer, charming and literate, always putting his guests at ease, and knowing instinctively how to draw them into a lively conversation for the audience.
These are only a few of the highlights of a life lived to the fullest.
Alan is survived by his wife Lynne, sister Ann Leech (Canton, Ohio)
sons Lance (Studio City, CA.), Devin (Bhusto Arsizio, Italy), David (Fort Worth, Texas) daughter Gail Munger (Indianapolis, Indiana) - Grandchildren; Ryder, Jack, Matteo, Marco and Leonardo Sloane, and Joshua and Rebekah Munger
Services are scheduled for January 29, 2011 at The Lakes Lutheran Church - 8200 W. Sahara, Las Vegas, Nevada. A Celebration of Life follows at Red Rock Country Club in Las Vegas.
In lieu of flowers, donations may be made to the Alfred Price Sloane Scholarship at Miami University in Oxford, Ohio. The family is currently organizing the scholarship through the Alumni Association.

Sunday, January 2, 2011

Fort Worth DWI No Refusal Weekend

New Year's Eve starts a "No Refusal" weekend in Dallas Fort Worth.

Law enforcement officials are saying for drivers, that means if a driver is pulled over on suspicion of DWI and they refuse the standard field sobriety test, officers will place them under arrest. Frankly, this more disinformation for the media because this has always been the case (being arrested when they refuse.) Drivers should continue to stand on the rights to refuse breath and blood test.

County and Municipal jails in the Dallas Fort Worth area had judges on site over the holiday to sign search warrants, as well as having a nurse available to draw blood for the purposes of determining if a driver is legally intoxicated. Some smaller police departments took those arrested directly to hospitals for blood samples after the warrant was signed.

Alcohol-related fatalities are the commonly stated reason behind the "No Refusal Law." However I have seen no evidence it makes a difference.

Saturday, December 18, 2010

Ways to avoid a DWI

How To Protect Your Rights During A DWI Traffic Stop in the Fort Worth area.

Let's dispense with the obvious. If you're drunk, then don't drive. Don't drive, because you don't want to hurt someone else or yourself. Don't drive, because you don't want to smash up your car or damage someone else's property. And finally, don't drive, because you don't want to get arrested, lose your license, pay huge fines, have your insurance go through the roof and perhaps even lose your job.

That said, let's move to the real world where you do not have to drive drunk to be arrested and found guilty of drunk driving. This is the world that says any person with virtually any amount of alcohol in their system is a candidate for a drunk-driving citation and 100% responsible for any accident that may occur, regardless of who caused the accident. This is not an exaggeration, and you should not assume that because you drink and drive in a responsible manner that you are immune from the "drunk-driver" label and the consequences of a drunk-driving conviction.

If you drink and drive in the Fort Worth area, no matter how conservatively, there is a real possibility that you could be stopped, arrested, and convicted of drunk driving. First, most people do not realize how few drinks it takes to exceed the legal standards of .08 % or .1 % Blood Alcohol Content (BAC). For the average sized person, three or four drinks could easily place them in the "drunk-driver" category. However, based solely on a police officer's claim that you were "impaired," even though your BAC was below the legal threshold, you can be convicted as a drunk driver. The only additional evidence needed would be proof of some measurable amount of alcohol in your system.

Is this fair? No. Is it right? No. Does this improve highway safety? No. In fact, it detracts from highway safety.

How do you avoid being caught up in a DWI nightmare in Tarrant County? Well, you could avoid drinking and driving altogether. That means no beer after the ball game, no wine with your meal, no drinking at holiday parties, sticking to soft drinks at wedding receptions, no meeting your friends after work for a drink and socializing. You get the picture. However, if you choose to drink and drive, there are a number of things you can do to lesson the likelihood of being stopped and charged with a drunk-driving violation.

Your Vehicle

Police officers in the Fort Worth area need an excuse to stop a vehicle; there must be some probable violation to justify stopping your vehicle. Frankly, they can always come up with an excuse to stop any vehicle they want to -- a dirty license plate is a violation. But, if given the choice, they will stop the vehicles with the most obvious violations. Speeding, failing to use signals, rolling through a stop sign or driving with burned out lights are common justifications for stopping a motorist. Most of these are controllable items or situations.

For example, once every two or three weeks turn on all the lights on your vehicles(s). Check both headlight beams, taillights, clearance lights, brake lights and turn signals. And don't forget the license plate light (this is a favorite!) Your headlights should be properly aimed, also. Make sure your license plates are properly affixed and readable.

Darkly tinted windows, loud exhaust pipes, broken lenses, unrepaired body damage and cracked windows all serve as the necessary excuse to stop a vehicle.

If the vehicle you are driving is registered in the name of someone who has been convicted of drunk driving it would be wise to not drink and drive in that vehicle. Police officers spend large amounts of time riding around reading license plate numbers into a central computer. When they find a vehicle licensed to someone convicted of drunk driving, especially late at night, they will always find an excuse to pull that car over.

Traffic Laws

Obviously, violating traffic laws in the Fort Worth area or elsewhere is a good way to attract the attention of police officers. At the same time, driving below an already under posted speed limit, signaling a turn a half a mile before turning or not taking your turn at a stop sign will also attract attention. It is virtually impossible to drive more than a mile or two without violating some arcane traffic law. If you have the option of pulling into a parking lot or otherwise avoid having a patrol car follow you for a long distance there will be less likelihood of being stopped for a traffic violation. Making sure to wear your seat belt is one way to convey an aura of "safety."

Driving Time And Place in the Fort Worth area

The chances of being stopped under a variety of pretenses at "bar time" are fairly high. However, the police are also attuned to special events like festivals, sports contests, large wedding receptions, church picnics and company parties. Enforcement may be intensified in these environments. If you are moving with traffic and your vehicle is well maintained and not "standing out" for any reason, you are much more likely not to be stopped for enforcement purposes.

If you have alternative routes that you can take to your destination, particularly in the later evening, that avoid those areas with the largest concentrations of taverns, bars and nightclubs, you will also be avoiding the largest concentration of enforcement activity. Taking the longer, less traveled route may turn out to be a short cut in the long run!

You've Been Stopped by the police after drinking, Now What?

Despite your best efforts, a just-burned-out headlight has given a police officer an excuse to stop you. Under other circumstances you might welcome being told about your failed headlight before you left the lighted city streets. But, you have been drinking, not in excess, but drinking never the less. What should you do?

First, always keep documents like your registration and insurance card in a readily accessible location. You do not want to have to fish through your glove box, or worse, to not find these documents when you need them. When the blue lights go on, find a safe place to pull over, always on the right side of the road whenever possible. Next, turn your dome light on and place both your hands on the steering wheel where the police officer can see them. This makes him more comfortable about his safety and conveys a sense of personal control on your part. If the opportunity presents itself, it's best to roll down your window and vent the passenger compartment of accumulated odors prior to actually stopping.

Be courteous, but admit to nothing. If the officer asks if you have been drinking return his question with a question, "would you like to see my license?" or "why do you ask?" Do not admit to drinking so much as one beer. You are under no obligation to give the officer any information beyond that on your driver's license. Your admission to drinking gives the officer "cause" to pursue the matter further. Without that admission he must base his decision on pursuing a DWI arrest on your driving, or mannerisms after the stop. A burned-out headlight is not an indication of impairment and neither is a refusal to chitchat about your night's events.

If he decides to push the issue, he may ask you to step out of your vehicle, which the courts say is permissible. He may ask you to perform certain tests, "just to prove you're capable of driving safely." Do not perform any of these tests. You are not required to perform these tests and there is no penalty for refusal. The ONLY reason these tests are given is to give the officer justification to require you to take a chemical test (breath, blood or urine) to determine your Blood Alcohol Content, BAC and of course more and better ammunition in court. These encounters are nearly always being videotaped. No one ever "passes" one of these roadside sobriety tests, not even the "soberest" of the sober.

Texas does require a driver to submit to a chemical test, or face administrative driver's license penalties. However, the police officer must have at least "reasonable suspicion" that you are impaired by alcohol to legally ask you to take one of the chemical tests. If you show no obvious signs of intoxication, have made no admission to drinking and have performed no tests that he can claim you performed inadequately, his grounds for forcing the testing are limited to the way you were driving and your present(unmanipulated)demeanor. If your drinking has not been clearly excessive, neither your driving nor your demeanor should support reasonable suspicion to demand a chemical BAC test. The only common defense for refusing to take a chemical test is that the officer did not have a lawful reason to stop you or probable cause to require the test. Refusal to participate in the charade of a roadside sobriety test in the Fort Worth area are not probable cause to require a chemical test.

If you are not "drunk," it is usually advantageous to you to have the stop recorded on a video camera. Most police cars in Tarrant, Parker, Wise, Denton, and Dallas County are equipped with video cameras for just this purpose. However, police officers will sometimes avoid turning the camera on if they think the resulting documentation will detract from the possibility of a conviction. Ask the officer if his car has a video camera and if he has it turned on. If he does not have the camera turned on and you believe it would be advantageous to your defense, ask him to turn it on, that you want the stop recorded. This sends a message that you are not afraid to have your mannerisms and demeanor judged by an impartial judge or jury. It's very difficult for a police officer in the Fort Worth area to claim your "speech was slurred" or that you were "staggering" when you got out of the car when a video film shows a composed articulate defendant being interrogated on an unlit roadside by a uniformed, gun-toting agent of the law.

If you notice that the officer is intent on sticking a flashlight in your face or in your car, it is probably because the flashlight is equipped with an electronic alcohol sensor that detects the presence of alcohol. Texas Alcohol Beverage Control Agents (I call them Liquor-Dicks are notorious for having these devices.) You do not have to accept this "probing." You can instruct the officer to keep the device away from your face and out of your vehicle. He is free to look into your vehicle, but only from the exterior, unless he requests to search your vehicle. NEVER voluntarily permit a search of your vehicle. To search your car, depending on the jurisdiction, an officer must have probable cause or at least reasonable suspicion, a suspicion he must be able to explain in terms of what he is looking for and why he believes he will find this specific illegal item in your vehicle. There is absolutely no good that can come to you by voluntarily allowing the police to search your vehicle.

Another pre-screening test that falls in and out of favor in DWI Arrest in the Fort Worth area is called the nystagmus test. By shining a flashlight in the drivers eyes and instructing the driver to scan left and right the officer looks for a jerking eye motion that is sometimes an indication of intoxication. It takes training and experience on the part of the police officer to perform this test. In reality, jerky eye movement or not, the officer can say he performed the test, detected the telltale eye movement, and therefore felt justified in ordering the defendant to take a chemical test. Again, you do not have to take the nystagmus test and should refuse to do so. Just as with the other pre-screening tests, the only reason they are conducted is to justify requiring a chemical test and to build a case against the defendant.

Will your refusals to cooperate with the officer's requests for pre-screening tests irritate the officer? Yes, they probably will. But, keep in mind that if he asked you to take these tests he has already decided to find a way to justify requiring you to take a mandated chemical test. There is no good reason for you to assist him in this effort. Furthermore, if he senses a lawsuit in the making, if he falsely arrests you for drunk driving, he might just decide to find an easier target to fulfill his nightly quota.

Of equal importance, without the additional evidence that the pre-screening tests provide, or pretend to provide, the prosecution will find it very difficult to make a case against you, if your BAC is close to the legal limit, or below.

Despite all evidence to the contrary, if the officer decides a chemical test is justified you typically have three choices of test procedures: Breathalyzer, urine test, or blood test. Frequently, the police will use a Breathalyzer test for the initial screening. However, you are almost always guaranteed the option of taking one of the other two tests, at your request. Of course you have the right to refuse ALL of them and absolutely should if you have any doubt what the results may be.

The Breathalyzer is the most inaccurate means of measuring your BAC. These devices are pretty much garbage. Without going into great detail, it should be understood that the error factor can be as high as 50 %. If the Breathalyzer generates a reading that confirms your BAC is within legal limits, you should be free to leave. If the Breathalyzer test results indicate an illegal BAC, you should immediately request one of the two other tests, the most accurate of which is the blood test. If the police refuse to assist you in obtaining a second test, demand an opportunity to obtain a second test, even if it must be at your own expense.

A legitimate police stop for a suspected drunk-driving incident does not have to rely on trick questions, sensing devices, or gimmicks to justify a chemical test of the driver. The driver's lack of control of the vehicle, his inability to reasonably react to questions and requests, and his physical reactions will be a dead give-away of his impaired condition. Unfortunately, the government, certain commercial interests, and self-serving organizations have institutionalized a negative stereotype of anyone who drinks and drives, no matter how responsibly. By labeling virtually all drivers who drink and drive as "drunk drivers," they have created a situation where responsible and constructive citizens are at risk of suffering huge fines, exorbitant insurance charges, loss of driving licenses, confiscation of personal property, and even incarceration, all for the singular act of violating an arbitrary and unreasonable BAC standard.

If you have been arrested for DWI in Tarrant, Parker, Wise, Denton or Dallas county and need an experienced criminal defense lawyer give me a call!

Tuesday, October 19, 2010

NORML - Attorney David Sloane to use Medical “Necessity” as Defense to Prosecution in Marijuana Possession case.

WEATHERFORD, TEXAS - On September 30, 2010 detectives from Weatherford Police Department appeared at the residence of a 52-year-old Weatherford man who smokes marijuana to alleviate his suffering from diabetic neuropathy with severe symptoms including chronic pain and insomnia. He has done so with the full knowledge and support of his physicians claiming they could not provide him with the synthetic substitute Marinol because it was heavily regulated and reserved for Cancer and HIV patients. The detectives told the man they had received “a tip” that he was growing marijuana on the premises. Once inside they found one cannabis plant growing and approximate 1.5 ounces of cannabis already harvested. Whether this case will be prosecuted as a misdemeanor or a felony is yet to be determined depending on the dried weight of the cannabis seized.

Fort Worth Attorney David Sloane says he intends to raise the defense of necessity as well as other procedural and constitutional grounds in defending this case. Sloane is a legislative committee member for the National Organization of Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) and an officer of the local DFW NORML chapter. Sloane says fifteen states now recognize the medical need and necessity of lawful marijuana use. A 2009 Texas bill that would have allowed seriously ill patients to raise a medical necessity defense to the specific offense of marijuana possession died in committee. Sloane said he sees no problem proceeding without this legislation under these circumstances. Texas penal law already provides for a justification of necessity for all criminal law violations “if the actor reasonably believes the conduct is immediately necessary to avoid imminent harm” and “the desirability and urgency of avoiding the harm clearly outweighs…the harm sought to be prevented by the law proscribing the conduct. “ Had the 2009 bill passed it might have curtailed number of needless arrest of medical patients here in Texas but that doesn’t mean the common and statutory defenses and justifications for all offenses aren’t still available to us in the courts.

I must admit I was a little intimidated in trying this even though my repeated application of the facts to the law in this case told me this is what I should do. I had never even heard of anyone else trying it here Sloane said. But then I found a case from Amarillo with substantially similar facts where it took the jury eleven-minutes to find a marijuana patient not guilty when they were given the opportunity to consider his medical necessity. I have gone from believing it would be a long-shot to believing it would be malpractice not to raise it in defending a medical marijuana patient with what appears to be a genuine need. Sloane said if the Texas legislature wants to continue dragging their heels by ignoring the medical needs of their citizens that’s fine I guess. But I’m going to do my job. And I’m hoping these judges and juries will do theirs.